Does religious faith come from a person's genetic makeup?

Search

Comments

Apple Insults Islam? Muslim23 : Well before so quickly jumping into your assumptions and po
Science Without Jesus Mr. Perhaps : Wow, I defy (challenge) anyone to use more words or longer r
: Thanks for sharing that Mitch..sorry about my spelling and p
Intervention Theory D. Andrew White M.Sc. : The logic of ET-interventionists is cool. Lets try some: (A)
Mountain Park Baptist Boarding Academy Daniel Brinegar : I loved Mountain Park and Palm Lane. I was at MP from June 5
: So happy to hear that the Lord interveaned into your life..t
Contacting the Dead? It's Become a Lively Business Rose : Hello I would like to share my storey..Alls I can say is in
lasting link : heartbroke; i think i can help u i believe ur mom name start
Praise the Lord and Pass the Joystick SJR : This statement is posted from an employee of Left Behind Gam
Russian UFO hoax daz : I find the initial news release fantastical, not to mention
D. Andrew White M.Sc. : The 1908 Tunguska event was interesting because it was one o
Woman who claims that she was hurt sues Ernest Angley Witboy : I am saddened after reading all these hateful words against
GIDION : Ernest Angley Ministries does not allow anyone in a wheel ch

« Femdom for Jesus • Home • The Da Vinci Code inspires grave robbery »

God gene

• Hodgepodge

Christianity as a genetic impairment or geneticists gone wild?

Dr Dean Hamer, the director of the Gene Structure and Regulation Unit at the National Cancer Institute in America, asked volunteers 226 questions in order to determine how spiritually connected they felt to the universe. The higher their score, the greater a person's ability to believe in a greater spiritual force and, Dr Hamer found, the more likely they were to share the gene, VMAT2.

'God gene' discovered by scientist behind gay DNA theory

Richard Evans Lee
November 14, 2004 • Permalink
BlinkList • del.icio.us • Digg it • Furl • ma.gnolia • Netvouz
RawSugar • Shadows • Simpy • Spurl • Yahoo MyWeb
Top↑

Comments

Bollocks says I. I'm beginning to think that we should not pay attention to any scientist not published in journals and either vetted or refuted. This is right up there with the global warming detractors that say nothing more than 'nu-uh' in responce to SCIENTIFIC consensus.

Posted by: Eli Sarver | November 14, 2004 02:52 PM

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about God gene. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard

Name/Pseudonym:

Email Address (never displayed)

Website:

Remember info?

Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style)

Monthly Summaries

June 2006, May 2006, April 2006, March 2006, February 2006, January 2006, December 2005, November 2005, October 2005, September 2005, August 2005, July 2005, June 2005, May 2005, April 2005, March 2005, February 2005, December 2004, November 2004, October 2004, September 2004, August 2004, July 2004, June 2004, May 2004, April 2004, March 2004, February 2004, January 2004, December 2003, November 2003, October 2003, September 2003, August 2003, July 2003, June 2003, May 2003, April 2003, March 2003, February 2003, January 2003, December 2002, November 2002, October 2002, September 2002, August 2002, May 2002, April 2002, March 2002,

Thematic Archives

Syndication

Edifying Spectacle
Index
Hodgepodge
God gene
Top of page

Edifying Spectacle

Anti-theism, skepticism: noting wishful thinking and quackery.

Search

Comments

God gene

• Hodgepodge

Comments

How do you feel?

Monthly Summaries

Recent Posts

Thematic Archives

Syndication