Intelligend Design is Like Marxist History
• Evolutionary Theory
Is ID so unscientific that you can't even call it pseudoscience?
It is sometimes complained that IDers resemble the Marxist historians who always found a way to modify and reframe their theory so it evades any possible falsification, never offering an experimental procedure by which ID could in principle be falsified. To my mind, this complaint is warranted indeed. But the primary problem is not with the intellectual honesty of IDers, but with the nature of their theory. The theory simply cannot be fashioned to make any potentially falsified predictions, and therefore cannot earn entry into the game of science.
Is Intelligent Design a Bad Scientific Theory or a Non-Scientific Theory?
Comments
Posted by: Bubba | November 15, 2006 7:01 PM
Posted by: Rose | November 16, 2006 7:07 PM