Arguing with Creationists
• Pseudoscience
In debunking George Gilder’s Evolution and Me, John Derbyshire gives a good clean summary of why it isn’t worth the time to debate with fans of Intelligent Design and Creationism:
I’ll also say that I write the following with some reluctance. It’s a wearying business, arguing with Creationists. Basically, it is a game of Whack-a-Mole. They make an argument, you whack it down. They make a second, you whack it down. They make a third, you whack it down. So they make the first argument again. This is why most biologists just can’t be bothered with Creationism at all, even for the fun of it. It isn’t actually any fun. Creationists just chase you round in circles. It’s boring.
Comments
'True or False: The world is run by invisible beings who need to be worshipped.'
If they answer 'True', forget it. They live in a fairy tale world and you might as well argue with your dog.
Posted by: Iremon | July 16, 2006 8:11 PM