« Structure-FunctionHomeJews Who Write About Christianity »

Arguing with Creationists

Pseudoscience

In debunking George Gilder’s Evolution and Me, John Derbyshire gives a good clean summary of why it isn’t worth the time to debate with fans of Intelligent Design and Creationism:

I’ll also say that I write the following with some reluctance. It’s a wearying business, arguing with Creationists. Basically, it is a game of Whack-a-Mole. They make an argument, you whack it down. They make a second, you whack it down. They make a third, you whack it down. So they make the first argument again. This is why most biologists just can’t be bothered with Creationism at all, even for the fun of it. It isn’t actually any fun. Creationists just chase you round in circles. It’s boring.

George Gilder, Metaphysic

Comments

Just one simple statement-
'True or False: The world is run by invisible beings who need to be worshipped.'

If they answer 'True', forget it. They live in a fairy tale world and you might as well argue with your dog.

How do you feel?

Feel free to share your feelings about Arguing with Creationists. Please stick to the theme of the entry. Disagreement is fine. Homophobia, racism, and kindred expressions of hatred will be deleted. This site is one of my hobbies. I genuinely enjoy hearing from people and hate moderating or killing comments. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard